3 ms·
Microsoft could have quite legitimately just yanked the app until they could rewrite it without the GPL code. The contractor would be toast (probably had an ind
by kevinpet 17y ago
Microsoft could have quite legitimately just yanked the app until they could rewrite it without the GPL code. The contractor would be toast (probably had an indemnification clause), MS wouldn't have been on the hook for that much even if the copyright holders of the GPL code sued for infringement, as it wasn't willful.
The GPL absolutely does not force them to do so. It cannot, as it is simply a copyright license. The GPL actually terminated as soon as MS distributed the code, since they weren't following it's rules.
I don't know if they have a formal agreement with the copyright owner, or if they're just following what is an accepted practice in opening the source, but technically GPL v2 cannot be "reactivated" on its own.
- freetard 17y ago> Microsoft could have quite legitimately just yanked the app until they could rewrite it without the GPL code. Nope, as soon as you publish your app publically, you are forced to give the whole source code of that version of the app to anyone who downloaded the binary and asks for the source.
- eli 17y agoHmm, so I can give away copies of MS Office so long as I stop when someone points out it's copyright violation?
- jmillikin 17y agoYou would probably have to pay damages; see the ongoing drama of RIAA v. The Public for an example.