2 ms·
Although this also covers non-ionizing radiation, this is a very different frequency range.
by anateus 11y ago
Although this also covers non-ionizing radiation, this is a very different frequency range.
- jjoonathan 11y agoTrue, and if someone has a link handy for a similar review covering >1mm wavelengths it would undeniably be more pertinent. Still, the original link rubs me wrong in two ways: 1. It's paywalled. Many of us can't even RTFP. 2. It's clearly trying to prove a pet model. There's nothing inherently wrong with #2, but #2 makes this article a bad place to start a discussion among non-experts who aren't in a position to judge the model in comparison to others that answer similar questions. This problem is exacerbated by #1.