3 ms·

Thanks for the feedback! Compared to landscape.io (or other tools) we have a different approach to code checking since we develop our own algorithms and even al

Thanks for the feedback! Compared to landscape.io (or other tools) we have a different approach to code checking since we develop our own algorithms and even allow our users to create custom code checks using a code pattern language (http://docs.quantifiedcode.com/patterns/language/index.html http://docs.quantifiedcode.com/patterns/language/index.html) landscape.io is a great tool of course (in fact we've been in touch with Carl since a while) but we really wanted to go in a different direction with this and build a tool that goes beyond providing a simple frontend to existing tools. The current beta of QuantifiedCode is of course just the beginning and does lack many features that we're currently working on (e.g. giving the user access to the graph representation of code that we use internally), so stay tuned for more. BTW we have open-sourced our own "Prospector"-like tool, checkmate (https://github.com/quantifiedcode/checkmate https://github.com/quantifiedcode/checkmate). Right now it's still in beta though and we don't pursue it very actively since we use mainly our graph-based approach to code analysis now (so we don't need to aggregate output from different tools).

jquast 12y ago
I did look at checkmate. It was my mistake in believing this was the total sum of the checker used in quantifiedcode. One problem I have with such monetary solutions is that in business where I am willing to pay, I could not provide a SaaS tool like codechecker access to the enterprise github hosted on an internal network (or possibly some other repository service). I'd be happy to pay, but it just isn't technically feasible unless there is a self-hosting solution, which complicates things for you beyond what is profitable: I don't know what the solution is, but this is why I use only cmd-line tools like prospector in business, rather than simply paying for landscape.io or codechecker. I'll stay tuned, thanks for responding.

jquast 12y ago

I did look at checkmate. It was my mistake in believing this was the total sum of the checker used in quantifiedcode. One problem I have with such monetary solutions is that in business where I am willing to pay, I could not provide a SaaS tool like codechecker access to the enterprise github hosted on an internal network (or possibly some other repository service). I'd be happy to pay, but it just isn't technically feasible unless there is a self-hosting solution, which complicates things for you beyond what is profitable: I don't know what the solution is, but this is why I use only cmd-line tools like prospector in business, rather than simply paying for landscape.io or codechecker. I'll stay tuned, thanks for responding.