I agree with you as to the conclusion: I don't believe that cell-phones cause notably higher rates of cancer. I believe that based on the studies, as I think y

I agree with you as to the conclusion: I don't believe that cell-phones cause notably higher rates of cancer. I believe that based on the studies, as I think you do. The problem with the article, and perhaps the reasoning in your comment, is that it assumes that ionizing radiation is the sole cause of cancer. The article implies that cancer studies that consider anything other than ionizing radiation are a waste of time and money. I believe the debate as to whether there are non-radiation causes, catalysts or contributors to cancer is very much open, and I appreciate the work that people do to investigate these possibilities.