what a terrible opening to the article. it's just a load of unsupportable rants against things the author doesn't personally like. he even tries to disclaim tha

what a terrible opening to the article. it's just a load of unsupportable rants against things the author doesn't personally like. he even tries to disclaim that in his prologue but provides nothing beyond the assertions. there may be more substance later but once I hit the bullshit about "iFanboys" I decided not to bother. At best I'll just shake my head wondering why people think their personal anger is a compelling argument,