4 ms·
I hope your dE00 implementation proved to be less problematic for you. I had the dreaded "off by one" equivalent bug in my early implementation. I believe I sp
by zschuessler 11y ago
I hope your dE00 implementation proved to be less problematic for you. I had the dreaded "off by one" equivalent bug in my early implementation.
I believe I spent a couple days of agonizing troubleshooting to find the bug. Lots of places for it to hide in that wall of math...
Thanks for sharing!