2 ms·
What I'm saying is that I don't see how "all possible bet sizes" leads to a game tree of 10^161. It's got to be more unless they're taking some shortcuts, such
by fsk 11y ago
What I'm saying is that I don't see how "all possible bet sizes" leads to a game tree of 10^161. It's got to be more unless they're taking some shortcuts, such as saying that a pot size of 24xBB and 25xBB are treated as equivalent.
Also, it seems that they are only considering one stack size, where you have 100x or 200x the big blind. If the poker solver does all possible stack sizes, then it can't possibly be 10^161.
- TylerE 11y agoIn practical play the small blind is often the basic "unit", so usually the smallest delta between successive bet sizes are the size of the small blind, or half that (e.g. at $1/$2, allowed bets might be $2, $2.50, etc)