> Assertions by Google+ boosters that there's some vast quantity of non-public activity seem unsubstantiated. This has of course been around the beginning (whe

> Assertions by Google+ boosters that there's some vast quantity of non-public activity seem unsubstantiated. This has of course been around the beginning (when both you and I were also around). The "readers of the gaps" argument, "you can't PROVE there aren't a zillion users there! Oh, you did prove they're not there in particular. But you can't prove they're also not in this other place! Ha!" Has anyone condemned you as a Facebook shill yet?