It's fascinating how far computers have come. I remember Kasparov being pissed off at Deep Blue because it wasn't a "computer move." I do think there is a down

It's fascinating how far computers have come. I remember Kasparov being pissed off at Deep Blue because it wasn't a "computer move." I do think there is a down side for games being solved with computers. Mostly because games become highly calculated and right moves become computer moves. Take a look at Paul Morphy's games. They are elegant and exciting to watch and analyze. I just don't see the same play happening today with human or computer players. Murphy would lose today but his games were beautiful, maybe even "incorrect" by today's standards.