3 ms·

Hi, I once tried that, but I ran into problems with lazyness. In particular my data structure was rather simple (famous gap data structure), but editing "large"

Hi, I once tried that, but I ran into problems with lazyness. In particular my data structure was rather simple (famous gap data structure), but editing "large" files (>1000LOC) became rather unpleasant (too big input-feedback latency). However I managed to build a _very_ basic proof-of-concept editor (no dependencies) in just a few hundreds lines of code which I could explain, but until now I was too shy to share it as it did not involve magic abstract Haskell-foo ... ;)

implicit 11y ago
That's a shame! "Gets the job done in just a few hundred lines of easily-explained code" is a terrific standard to meet. "Magic abstract Haskell-fu" cannot improve such a program very much.
codygman 11y ago
> I was too shy to share it as it did not involve magic abstract Haskell-foo Please don't be, simple understandable Haskell code is very nice :) Plus if there is a better way of doing it you get to find that out too.