> Also, it's objectivley a bad logo. Always has been. Always will be. An objectively bad logo would be one that isn't readable, doesn't work at small sizes, do

> Also, it's objectivley a bad logo. Always has been. Always will be. An objectively bad logo would be one that isn't readable, doesn't work at small sizes, doesn't work in black and white, etc. None of these things are true of the NeXT logo. Personally, I've always been fond of it. I find it striking, timeless, and I enjoy the choice of colours: a choice of four colours brings to mind education/learning/fun, but with a bit more imagination than a classic red, blue, green and yellow (e.g. Google). Each to their own.