I don't think an n=1 test would be useful. Depending on people's preconceived biases, they would just say "see this confirms what I thought!" or "lol n=1 is mea

I don't think an n=1 test would be useful. Depending on people's preconceived biases, they would just say "see this confirms what I thought!" or "lol n=1 is meaningless". To do something conclusive, you'd need to do a real trial with n>>1. That costs way more money than Business Insider (or most other venues) is going to spend on an article.