5 ms·

Can you please explain why?

• userbinator 11y ago
  0.0.0.0 is a completely invalid destination IP, and any attempts to establish a connection to it will fail long before any packets are sent. 127.0.0.1 is still valid so you depend on the network stack to either receive a RST sent to itself, or time out. At least on Windows, the former is much faster to return with an error. It also avoids potential conflicts if you happen to need to run a server on port 80 for any reason.
  • MichaelCrawford 11y ago
    When I ping 0.0.0.0, I get replies from 69.41.141.1. I don't know but expect that's earthlink's router.
    • userbinator 11y ago
      That's odd... on Windows, pinging 0.0.0.0 results in "Destination specified is invalid." On *nix, the behaviour is slightly different and is supposed to ping localhost instead (confirmed on one of my Linux machines): http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/99336/how-does-ping-zero-works http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/99336/how-does-ping-...
      • MichaelCrawford 11y ago
        Do the RFCs have anything to say about 0.0.0.0? Perhaps it is left up to the implementation, in which case both Windows and *NIX would be, strictly speaking, correct.
  • seanp2k2 11y ago
    This isn't true on non-windows OSes, where 0.0.0.0 (or simply 0) means all interfaces, not nothing. ssh to a web server and do curl 0 ; it's a super-useful shortcut. Further reading: http://serverfault.com/questions/78048/whats-the-difference-between-ip-address-0-0-0-0-and-127-0-0- http://serverfault.com/questions/78048/whats-the-difference-... http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.0.0.0 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.0.0.0