2 ms·
I think at this stage we need to consider this a part of how the internet works. I'm far from an expert, but I do think that the majority of legislative effort
by netcan 12y ago
I think at this stage we need to consider this a part of how the internet works.
I'm far from an expert, but I do think that the majority of legislative efforts as well as many initiatives from browser makers are approaching this wrong. Privacy, as much transparency as possible and optional setting for anything that comes with a trade-off need to be built into the browser, and not as a request sent to websites.
Transacting, being logged in, and certainly browsing are not inherently hindered by privacy. It's up to users (or their browser really) to demand it, in the economic sense of demand.
For now, there is no cost to this kind of tracking so it happens almost by default. Moral or even legislative pressure will not have the same effect as economic pressure. The decision to protect users privacy or not needs to come with costs.
- mike-cardwell 12y agoWhen the major browser developers directly profit from being able to track users across the web, they're not going to make modifications to the way browsers work to prevent tracking. Not in any meaningful way. It's a shame so many people use Chrome. They're effectively giving an Ad company which specialises in tracking people, power to control how the web develops.