3 ms·
>>*Correction, April 21, 2015: This article originally >>misstated that a purchase of options on March 27 >>immediately followed a tweet by journalist Dana Matt
by romanixromanix 11y ago
>>*Correction, April 21, 2015: This article originally
>>misstated that a purchase of options on March 27
>>immediately followed a tweet by journalist Dana Mattioli.
>>It occurred 19 seconds before the tweet and followed a
>>newswire post by one second.
So the title of the whole article is totally misleading. It has nothing to do with Tweets & Twitter.
Maybe the same bot (script) has done dozens other trades (false positives) at a loss before.
- giarc 11y agoI wonder how accurate the timing is, although 19 seconds is a very long time to be off by.