It seems pretty clear to me and with the lack of peer-review and technical details paints a pretty disturbing picture. When I saw those names an image formed o

It seems pretty clear to me and with the lack of peer-review and technical details paints a pretty disturbing picture. When I saw those names an image formed of a company gearing up to bend the government to its business objectives through its board's political ties. Now, I'm not sure if that's because: A.) They don't have a game changer or it's going to come under fierce scrutiny by the larger scientific community so they need to try to mandate its use through legal means and using the military as a gateway and OUR military budget as an early source of funds. OR B.) Even though they have the real deal, the nature of the political landscape in which medicine operates necessitates the back-room dealing that this board can deliver on.