4 ms·
That's a prior patent not prior art i.e. Apple hasn't used it in a product yet. Moreover Apple having a patent suggests Google applied for a patent for their ow
by hemonthe 11y ago
That's a prior patent not prior art i.e. Apple hasn't used it in a product yet. Moreover Apple having a patent suggests Google applied for a patent for their own implementation to avoid getting sued by Apple. Apple has a history of litigation to stifle competition.
- IBM 11y agoIt appears patents can serve as prior art. http://www.ericksonlawgroup.com/law/patents/patentfaq/what-is-prior-art/ http://www.ericksonlawgroup.com/law/patents/patentfaq/what-i...