4 ms·
You're ignoring all the people that aren't trying to replace Javascript because they're... using Javascript. It's has a lot of warts but with some mindfulness
by obsurveyor 11y ago
You're ignoring all the people that aren't trying to replace Javascript because they're... using Javascript. It's has a lot of warts but with some mindfulness it's entirely usable. No one can argue that people aren't getting things done with it and being successful.
- Roboprog 11y agoThank you. All of these BlahBlahScript wrappers don't change the fact that I still have to debug (and thus read, anyway) Javascript in the browser. Javascript isn't assembler, it's actually mostly OK to read - I kind of like it. I only recently discovered JSDoc, and it goes a long way towards documenting types when they matter, especially if your IDE/editor (e.g. - WebStorm) recognizes the annotations and displays them when you click on a symbol.