3 ms·
TypeScript as of today is supported by a total of zero browsers with zero planned to add support in the near future. It doesn't replaces JavaScript in any way,
by UnoriginalGuy 12y ago
TypeScript as of today is supported by a total of zero browsers with zero planned to add support in the near future. It doesn't replaces JavaScript in any way, just builds a larger house on the sand.
- michaelwww 12y agoYou don't know anything about TypeScript, yet you choose to weigh in on it. Interesting. I think you must be confusing TypeScript with something else, like Dart maybe?
- UnoriginalGuy 12y agoPlease clarify what I said that was incorrect? I said that TypeScript doesn't have browser support (true) and that they have no plans to add browser support (true), and I added that TypeScript is like building a house on sand (i.e. it is all built on top of JavaScript, since there is no browser support for TypeScript). Please, go ahead, and correct my ignorance. Since I don't know anything...
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- michaelwww 12y agoThe stated goal of TypeScript was never to run in the browser. That's what confused me about your statement and made me wonder if you were confusing it with Dart. TypeScript wraps JavaScript with static type checking and some other useful contructs. It compiles to very clean and readable JavaScript. It's a tool, not a browser script.
- mikerichards 12y agoC/C++ doesn't have x86 machine support. Get it now?
- peteretep 12y ago> It doesn't replaces JavaScript in any way Except for the important place, my code tree