>But typeless languages are just maintenance nightmares that just get worse as time moves on. They are also inherently incompatible with any system which does u

>But typeless languages are just maintenance nightmares that just get worse as time moves on. They are also inherently incompatible with any system which does use types (which is most), like databases, XML, libraries, OS APIs, and so on. I can't load the article, so I have limited context here, but note that being dynamically typed is orthogonal to being weakly typed/typeless.