3 ms·
I always hear this: "statically typed languages make for more maintainable projects than dynamically typed languages." Is there any empirical evidence to back
by neonfreon 11y ago
I always hear this: "statically typed languages make for more maintainable projects than dynamically typed languages."
Is there any empirical evidence to back this up?
- dschiptsov 11y agoIf you are employed at a bank to manage a small team of Java coders, how could it be otherwise?)
- angersock 11y agoCOBOL was statically typed, and they've been maintaining those programs for decades!
- dschiptsov 11y agoWhat is wrong with those Common Lisp programs?)
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]