3 ms·
It seems like you build off the comments of issues, parsing for the :+1:, you could functionally provide the same tooling, but in the same additive way that waf
by sirwolfgang 11y ago
It seems like you build off the comments of issues, parsing for the :+1:, you could functionally provide the same tooling, but in the same additive way that waffle.io does.
- Ecco 11y agoWe're not parsing GitHub comments ATM. That's a good idea though, but it would be difficult to track content. Maybe it's just simpler to track issues in one place and improvements in another?
- sirwolfgang 11y agoLooking at Waffle.io, it seems to me that they don't actually store any data on their end. Everything is managed with issues, comments, and tagging.
- michaelmior 11y agoIt would be nice if GitHub just had a way to vote on issues without cluttering the comments and sending out lots of useless emails. Example: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant-installers/issues/12 https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant-installers/issues/12