Lazy, that is what I call it... In the past the rule was degrade gracefully if something keeps the JS from running. Now days its like "screw you, we can't be bo

Lazy, that is what I call it... In the past the rule was degrade gracefully if something keeps the JS from running. Now days its like "screw you, we can't be bothered to make it mostly work with css, so your out of luck if the JS didn't run". For me, I run with noscript. Most of the places I frequent (here for example!) work great without any JS, other places less so, but I can selectively enable what needs to run, and many times when I find those sites that simply don't work without javascript, I just click back, and ignore them. I don't trust sites that can't at least load some basic content to convince me they aren't just a malware vector.