3 ms·
I don't entirely disagree. But it's an oversimplification to state that the law thinks users are too stupid to see the difference in logos if the colour is the
by lucumo 17y ago
I don't entirely disagree. But it's an oversimplification to state that the law thinks users are too stupid to see the difference in logos if the colour is the same, as GGP did.
- jacquesm 17y agoThere is actually some good proof supporting the GGGP's point. Shady marketeers will use a completely different logo in the exact same shade of colour to fool people in to thinking they're dealing with the phone company when they send out bills for inclusion in bogus directories. It works, it's a simple as that. But that should mean to me that if you don't want any confusion that you should pick a black-and-white scheme and force the customer to read instead of using legal tricks to monopolize part of the spectrum.