3 ms·

You used the word "shit" 105 times in one post. At that saturation point, the only takeaway I got was "This guy sure likes to say 'shit.'"

• unalone 17y ago
  When I originally wrote the article, I was using the word stuff — but stuff is such a boring word. It's got a lag to it. Ditto other options, like things and work and product. Shit, on the other hand, is a very pointed, quick word. It serves perfectly as a placeholder for "anything else", which is what I'm really talking about. This isn't about writing good code, or good music, or making good music. It's about making anything. The technique is the same regardless of whether you're making a lesson plan or a DIY desk. I mean, it's not like I didn't know I was writing the word "shit". Usually I don't write any swears into my posts. This one, that one word was the point.
  • cfinke 17y ago
    I'm just letting you know that your point becomes shrouded by the repetition of a single word. If the entire point was that one word, then mission accomplished, because it's the only thing I'm going to remember about it.
    • unalone 17y ago
      I get what you're saying. I'm disappointed if that's all you got out of it.
      • jacquesm 17y ago
        I'm not much of a writer, but if I spot that I'm using the same word twice within two sentences of each other I'll try to find a suitable alternative. The reason for that is simple, this is not my first language and I find that if I'm not very careful I get caught up in my somewhat limited vocabulary. In dutch that problem would normally not hit me. If you write a piece like this and you have a point to make then it is a real pity that your choice of words gets in the way of getting the point across. There was this article a little while ago about 'shit my dad says', and you commented there that you thought it was excellent stuff. But it is the diametrical opposite of the way you write, he makes his point in one sentence, which may be coarse and rough around the edges, he may even use a swear word (or two), but it does not get in the way of the delivery. I swear I tried to read your piece, but after reading roughly a screenfull I simply gave up. That can't have been your intention (or maybe it was). The criticism here is too harsh I think, you probably have a valid point to make but if it got lost than that's a waste.
        • unalone 17y ago
          Fair enough. I'm not enough of a prick to think that my opinion overrides everybody else's. I don't think I was going to write another super-swear piece, but now I certainly won't. Oh, well. It's one piece. I can handle people not liking it. (As an aside: I never suspected English wasn't your first language! That comes as a bit of a shock.)
          • jacquesm 17y ago
            I'm still kind of interested in what it was you were trying to say though, maybe I'll re-try later on :) > (As an aside: I never suspected English wasn't your first language! That comes as a bit of a shock.) Why would that shock you ? It's true and there isn't a day that I don't learn something new about English. I also am quite dependent on my spell checker to keep me on the straight and narrow. And I can't seem to decide on English or American spelling, that's quite messy.
            • unalone 17y ago
              > Why would that shock you ? It's true and there isn't a day that I don't learn something new about English. I also am quite dependent on my spell checker to keep me on the straight and narrow. And I can't seem to decide on English or American spelling, that's quite messy. Mainly because I've been having conversations with you for a year, and you always state yourself so eloquently.
              • jacquesm 17y ago
                That's funny, I'm actually really frustrated by the inability to edit HN comments after a set time because I usually spot my errors only after that time has passed. Thanks for the compliment though :), but if you look a little harder I'm sure you'll find plenty of mistakes.
  • vlad 17y ago
    When I originally wrote the article, I was using the word stuff — but stuff is such a boring word. It's got a lag to it. Ditto other options, like things and work and product. Shit, on the other hand, is a very pointed, quick word. There is no generic word, offensive or not, worth repeating one hundred times in a short essay.
    • unalone 17y ago
      It was used once for every sixteen words. That means it was used less than once a sentence. If I was unintentionally saturating the essay, I'd agree with you that my style needs some fixing, but it was a deliberate choice and it wasn't overdone for what it aimed to be. Obviously we're going to disagree over whether it was overdone. That's subjective. I've seen a lot of positive response to this and surprisingly little negative. I'm fine with the response I'm getting overall. As for offensive: It's the word "shit". I'm not using it in an offensive way. I didn't write "How to shit great". I used it as a generic placeholder. Is it offensive just because it's a swear word? Because here I thought we were more mature than to get prissy over naughty language, particularly when it's not attempting to evoke naughty imagery.
      • dsplittgerber 17y ago
        If you wanted to emphasize the message instead of your stylistic means, you could have lessened the obtrusiveness of your style. By not doing so, I think you are rightfully criticized for style, when it should have been about the message.
        • unalone 17y ago
          I'm fine with being criticized — best way to learn to do better. I just resented the suggestions that I didn't know what I was doing. If I deliberately fuck up, I'll take my punches, but the comments implying I somehow accidentally used "shit" that many times kind of irritated me.
          • deleted 17y ago
            [deleted]