4 ms·
ON the other hand, Azure's PaaS offerings are way better than AWS's. No surprise there, since Azure started with PaaS and AWS started with IaaS.
by luisrudge 11y ago
ON the other hand, Azure's PaaS offerings are way better than AWS's. No surprise there, since Azure started with PaaS and AWS started with IaaS.
- olifante 11y agoI beg to disagree. As I wrote in another thread, Microsoft has not one but two Platform-as-a-Service offerings: - Azure Cloud Services (PaaS) - Azure Websites (PaaS light) Unfortunately, when I last looked at it four months ago, both of them were quite unattractive, at least for Python hosting. First of all, they have no support for automatically installing python dependencies, i.e. no support for pip. If you want to install e.g. django-rest-framework, you have to install it locally and then manually copy the installed files to Azure (with FTP, if I remember correctly). Secondly, they both run Python on a Windows Server running behind the IIS web server. Besides the fact that you will walk along the road less travelled (Django is overwhelmingly deployed on Linux), there is a very concrete limitation: if you want to install binary packages (e.g. PIL or Pillow), you have to manually compile them for Windows (and of course copy them manually to your Azure server). Yuck. If you want to use Azure, go with their IaaS offering (Azure Virtual Machines) and stay away from their PaaS offerings