2 ms·
Is your intent to prevent companies from becoming successful, or would that just be a happy side effect of such a policy? Edit: The question was sincere, and I
by bmelton 12y ago
Is your intent to prevent companies from becoming successful, or would that just be a happy side effect of such a policy?
Edit: The question was sincere, and I can't think of any reason for which a corporation of means should be in some way more responsible for frivolous lawsuits than one of lesser means, or of an individual.
The logical outcome, to me, seems to be that if there were some inequal burden in the eyes of the law for "wealthy companies" that it would invite frivolous lawsuits on the grounds that suing wealthy companies is now a zero risk endeavor.
If I, as an individual, could sue Google with zero fear of retaliation, I can't see why I wouldn't, on the off chance that I might land a pretty large windfall, if I were to win.