3 ms·

I don't understand all the defending of Pao on HN. She was pretty clearly in the wrong and there is not much evidence to the contrary. It's counter-productive t

by zxcvcxz 12y ago

I don't understand all the defending of Pao on HN. She was pretty clearly in the wrong and there is not much evidence to the contrary. It's counter-productive to the cause of gender equality to continue to defend her.

weixiyen 12y ago
what is your deal?
- zxcvcxz 12y ago
  I'm afraid I don't understand what it is you're asking. If you could clarify I'd be glad to go into the details of my "deal".
  - weixiyen 12y ago
    The deal being what is the point of posting 2 top level comments with the exact same content and intent. Asking not to get downvoted unless people provide evidence, and you not providing any evidence for starters.
    - zxcvcxz 12y ago
      Look very closely at the usernames. We are not the same person, just similar usernames (the other one has two 'v's). Not associated with the other poster at all, it's just a coincidence. I also don't think it's the "exact same content".
    - weixiyen 12y ago
      ah, noted... that's my bad.
colmvp 12y ago
There were definitely some erroneous or unsubstantiated claims she made in the court, some of which was testified against by people who she quoted.
codezero 12y ago
She lost the case. Sure. Can you enumerate why you are asserting she was "pretty clearly in the wrong?"