Exactly, this is the point. There are no news reports or history books, it's just the internet and that's live infinitely. I can't say I know what is the most

Exactly, this is the point. There are no news reports or history books, it's just the internet and that's live infinitely. I can't say I know what is the most correct way to integrate old media and new media. I can certainly say I'm in favor of keeping these mens' names unpublished if only that waspossible: their identities are known and can be looked up if needed but IMHO there's no need to have it readily available. I can, also certainly, say that this ideal is impossible on the internet: everything is readily available. And you can't control internet and you shouldn't, because beautiful things will get conceived when the internet is allowed to unravel freely. Much else can't be said about the court case itself: different nations have different laws and there's no general solution to how two different jurisdictions merge. Germany certainly has no say about the US jurisdiction and US certainly can't enforce their free speech policy in foreing countries. I assume the outcome is pretty random and I hope it doesn't set any significant precedents either way.