4 ms·
I had a brief look at Erlang in my spare time. Time passed, and I would have returned to it at some point, but then Elixir appeared on the radar, and it appear
by hnrem 11y ago
I had a brief look at Erlang in my spare time. Time passed, and I would have returned to it at some point, but then Elixir appeared on the radar, and it appears almost as a refreshed, improved Erlang, an Erlang 2.0. Well, why would I learn yesteryear's implementation instead of a modern implementation? So, I looked at Elixir, and now would need an unlikely compelling reason to look back in Erlang's direction with any serious effort. When people talk about Erlang, they talk about telephone switches and data stores - I'm never going to be hired to build either, how many are? Elixir being used for more modest feats of engineering makes it sound more appealing and accessible to the mortal majority, hence building momentum. That said, I've just looked at the roles advertised at a large London tech fair - two Golang, zero Elixir, zero Erlang, numerous .Net and Java, countless Javascript. Long way to go for new languages, and London feels excruciatingly risk-averse.
- xixixao 11y agoThat's funny because JavaScript could be considered a new language (unless you were counting the "JavaScript, HTML, CSS knowledge useful" descriptions). Languages take time, two Golang jobs is already pretty good given how young a language it is.
- hnrem 11y agoIts popularity increasing doesn't make it a new language. If you spend seconds on a web search you'll see that two is pathetic compared to elsewhere - I'm commenting on London there, not Go, or Elixir, both of which I would love to use, hence my grumbling.
- rdtsc 11y agoJavaScript is not a good comparison. Say I didn't like JavaScript, I can't just start writing Python for the browser. I have a choice of either shipping a product or not. So many learn, know and use it because they have no choice.