3 ms·
In what way? They aren't rejecting the app, they're rejecting the use of the trademark "Pebble" in the app's description.
by 7Z7 11y ago
In what way? They aren't rejecting the app, they're rejecting the use of the trademark "Pebble" in the app's description.
- mavdi 11y agoErm... Wouldn't that be similar to Google rejecting the trademark "Apple" from their search results? You're making it sound like Apple owns Pebble trademark and aren't happy for it to be used.
- s73v3r 11y agoGoogle does prevent you from using other trademarks in your Play Store copy.
- Oletros 11y ago> Google does prevent you from using other trademarks in your Play Store copy Can you point where it is stated or the related point in the policy? Thanks
- s73v3r 11y agoLook for any story where someone said they had their app taken down because they had copyrighted material in the promo pictures or used a trademarked name in the title or copy. https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/2986098?hl=en https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answ...
- Oletros 11y agoThose stories and policies is for using copyrighted material without permission or using trademarks without authorisation, totally different thing from not able to use trademarked names.
- sesteel 11y agoThey are suppressing information which could help a customer make a decision. Users can no longer search for or discover apps that support their watch via the AppStore. I view this behavior as anti-competitive and does not serve the greater public good. Apple is a corporation.