2 ms·
Oops, thanks for that - seems the results from the first run of the example somehow got lost in the final version and I didn't notice. The order of the output
by xylem 11y ago
Oops, thanks for that - seems the results from the first run of the example somehow got lost in the final version and I didn't notice.
The order of the output is dependent on when each call finished - they run in parallel, so it's not guaranteed that functions will end in the order they were invoked.
- mjpa 11y agoAh yes, so they do. My lack of sleep is showing! For some reason I was thinking the readdir would run in series so output would go up by ~1s each time.