3 ms·
I understand what PsyStar was doing and that was covered in my post, with the copyright portion. My post was specifically focusing on the intention that you sta
by kls 17y ago
I understand what PsyStar was doing and that was covered in my post, with the copyright portion. My post was specifically focusing on the intention that you stated. In which, rightfully so the intentions of a company after first sale are none existent. PsyStar was trying to confuse this with a host of other items to try to convolute the issue.
- ghshephard 17y agoFair enough - can we agree that we should all respect the author's intent (even after sale) when it comes to: o Whether you can distribute duplicates to others. o Whether you have to provide Attribution on duplicates o Whether you can distribute modifications o Whether you can resell duplicates for $$$
- kls 17y agoo Whether you can distribute duplicates to others. Yes and no depends on who produced the duplicate. Each OSX apple produced dvd is a duplicate of the original work. o Whether you have to provide Attribution on duplicates Yes o Whether you can distribute modifications This is dependent on copyright, but in the case of Apple's stance I would say no. o Whether you can resell duplicates for $$$ Yes, if they are duplicates produced by Apple. No, if you are producing the "back-ups" and you are just a reseller. The "US" courts have been clear on personal use back-ups before.