3 ms·

You're not wrong, but I may phrase it differently... F# lacks modules, instead favoring objects. Although it's derived from OCaml, it has omitted complex featu

You're not wrong, but I may phrase it differently... F# lacks modules, instead favoring objects. Although it's derived from OCaml, it has omitted complex features which don't fit in to the .net ecosystem.

riffraff 11y ago
but is there say, something that (S)ML's modules allow which is not possible to do with F#+.NET objects? I.e. ML's modules can be used to create interfaces and implementations of ADTs, but so can OO interfaces and classes.