> Your last sentence suggests that your problem isn't the specifics of the extradition treaty, but rather the concept of extradition in general. You misreprese

> Your last sentence suggests that your problem isn't the specifics of the extradition treaty, but rather the concept of extradition in general. You misrepresent what I said. I don't particularly object to extradition for crimes committed in US law on US soil, although I do think countries have a responsibility to protect their own citizens first and foremost (which is surely the primary purpose of nations). If an extradition treaty means I am effectively subject to inter-national law while in my home country, then I object, yes, very much.