3 ms·
>The NY Times wouldn't mention immigration because that would harm the Ehite House narrative about how 'good' it will be to open the borders and provide amnesty
by 01Michael10 11y ago
>The NY Times wouldn't mention immigration because that would harm the Ehite House narrative about how 'good' it will be to open the borders and provide amnesty.
I didn't realize the NY Times was an operative of the Obama administration...
- DamnYuppie 11y agoAn operative makes it sound like they are under the thumb of the administration. Which I doubt to be accurate, yet I would say they are co-conspirators who share the same left wing agenda.
- 01Michael10 11y agoOK... This left wing agenda thing must be new with the NY Times. It sure looked like they were "co-conspirators" with the Bush administration when they refused or didn't bother to investigate the administrations claims about weapons of mass destruction Saddam supposedly had... They were practically promoting another war with Iraq.
- DamnYuppie 11y agoSo then they are simply a co-opted mouth piece of the political incumbents. Yet I would tend to argue that most of their reporting tends toward the left, yet that could be a factor of being in NYC which is primarily left wing.