> In the long run, judges will rule in favor of public safety no matter the text of the constitution. What about this ruling? Is this in favor "of public safet

> In the long run, judges will rule in favor of public safety no matter the text of the constitution. What about this ruling? Is this in favor "of public safety no matter the text of the constitution"? It sounds like the cop was trying to get meth off the streets, isn't that a matter "of public safety"? > ..., but what I really care about is the well-being of people. It's best to do whatever helps people, not what some centuries-old text says. The problem, as you point out, is that not everyone interprets "well-being of people" the same way. For some, it means largely sticking to this centuries-old text.