41 ms·
True, but having been involved in the development of an LDAP client, LDAP is a horribly complex system to implement against (and its built on top of ASN.1, whic
by halostatue 12y ago
True, but having been involved in the development of an LDAP client, LDAP is a horribly complex system to implement against (and its built on top of ASN.1, which is possibly worse) and it was slow to get security features (LDAPS, etc.)—and in many cases, no two LDAP servers work quite the same (the most common LDAP server, ActiveDirectory, is the worst for this).
There is a need for something secure by default that is easy to use, easy to set up, easy to deploy, etc. Where this will be difficult is https://xkcd.com/927/ https://xkcd.com/927/.