Nothing I said contradicts your description of natural selection, that "fitness for making to the point where you have reproduced." But you are missing my point

Nothing I said contradicts your description of natural selection, that "fitness for making to the point where you have reproduced." But you are missing my point that the rate of evolution produced by natural selection is dependent on the turnover of the population. The parents need to die to make room for more fit offspring once the carrying capacity of the eco-system has been reached. If you still disagree, can you follow the link and point out flaws in the logic there?