3 ms·
It is along this line of thinking that activist end game is to prevent people from having pets; first start with specie that exhibit resemblance and some intell
by Shivetya 12y ago
It is along this line of thinking that activist end game is to prevent people from having pets; first start with specie that exhibit resemblance and some intelligence; parrots are smarter; then move on to new ground once the foothold is established.
So if by chance freedom is rewarded, how does anyone act on it? Return them to their specie country of origin? Build special approved habitats permanently funded by some new form of tax on zoo tickets, pet products, or the like? The down the road implications are not simple
- grecy 12y ago> The down the road implications are not simple The down the road implications for improving anything in our world are not simple. That's a very poor reason to improve nothing.
- dennyabraham 12y agoWere we to accord the rights of freedom and choice to animals, those that would rather stay with their human families would not be barred from doing so. In truth, if the relationship between a pet and its owner isn't symbiotic and mutually desired, it may be worth breaking.