The question I have is what does ownership mean if the thing owned is useless without something that cannot be owned/must be leased and cannot be replaced? Can

The question I have is what does ownership mean if the thing owned is useless without something that cannot be owned/must be leased and cannot be replaced? Can you say that it's really owned if you can't separate the leased part and can't use the thing without the leased part? I mean, sure, you're free to write any sort of contract you want, free market yadda yadda, but I think there's something meaningful in the point the article makes here...