3 ms·
A. running Mac in a VM on Linux is illegal B. Tower, Kaleidoscope. iTerm, and XCode are all Mac only C. How in Earth do you draw the conclusion that I've stop
by jaegerpicker 12y ago
A. running Mac in a VM on Linux is illegal
B. Tower, Kaleidoscope. iTerm, and XCode are all Mac only
C. How in Earth do you draw the conclusion that I've stopped myself from knowing anything? I am running CentOS, in the VM. I'm extremely familiar with the inner workings of Linux. If I'm running in a VM or as the main OS has no bearing on how much I know about my deployment target. It's still the same steps to setup a deployment target VM or on my actual laptop. In fact in the case of AWS you could argue that a VM is much closer to my deployment prod servers than laptop hardware would be.
- josteink 12y ago> A. running Mac in a VM on Linux is illegal According to who? Has this been tried in a court of law? If not, it's legal until proven otherwise. This BS by Mac-appologetics has got to stop.
- jaegerpicker 11y agoAccording to Apple and the License agreement you agree to run Mac OS X. It requires apple hardware to run the OS in the agreement. Perhaps you should read something prior to calling someone else out. 2. Permitted License Uses and Restrictions. A. This License allows you to install and use one copy of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled computer at a time. This License does not allow the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer at a time,and you may not make the Apple Software available over a network where it could be used by multiple computers at the same time. You may make one copy of the Apple Software (excluding the Boot ROM code) in machine-readable form for backup purposes only; provided that the backup copy must include all copyright or other proprietary notices contained on the original. from: http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/MacOSX.htm http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/MacOSX.htm