3 ms·
I stumbled onto the new design about a month ago. I had mixed reactions to it, one side of which was like yours: "Oh no, they're going to ruin it." But then I
by gavinpc 11y ago
I stumbled onto the new design about a month ago. I had mixed reactions to it, one side of which was like yours: "Oh no, they're going to ruin it."
But then I found these amazing treasures that were so much better than what I was looking for [0].
The Internet Archive is so priceless, so special, and so impossibly good, that I have to trust the people who make it.
As long as they are "focused on how the site looks," there is nothing they could do to ruin it. Yes, the changes are pointless for someone who was already happy with it. But if they are able to bring more attention and support this way, then more power to them. Their #1 job is to keep it alive, and I'm sure this is motivated with that in mind.
And after all, they have an API.
[0] https://archive.org/stream/playseditedannot03shakuoft#page/176/mode/2up https://archive.org/stream/playseditedannot03shakuoft#page/1...
- anc84 11y agoAs someone who likes to share data sets via IA, their hiding of the plain list of originally uploaded files behind a non-colored link that only gets highlighted on mouse over made me furious many times. I don't want to have to combine a simple "download my data there" with "then move the mouse there and see how it is actually a link and oh by the way the actual files I meant to link you to are available if you click that". I totally understand their motivation and I think it is great to present the potentially popular parts of the archives to the public in an "experience". But it worsened my user experience and motivation as a contributor(!).