5 ms·

This is science fiction, we can't and aren't doing this.

• qnaal 11y ago
  where do we get doritos
  • MrDosu 11y ago
    Doritotrees?
  • icebraining 11y ago
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIp_zhBIZ7s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIp_zhBIZ7s
• deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
• Swizec 11y ago
  That probably depends a lot on how you define "base components". I agree, splitting into molecules is science fiction. But I don't doubt that for milk, for instance, they separate it completely into fat, lactose, water, and other stuff. Then assemble them back together. It's the easiest way to get 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2% etc milk. I don't think you could do it without starting all of them from 0% milk. Especially considering you have to compensate the lack of taste from fat with extra lactose. And you can't use "added sugars" without raising major red flags with consumers. So you use lactose. Because it's already in milk. And you don't have to say you've added it. Source: my friend who studied food science.
  • MrDosu 11y ago
    This still is complete fabrication. "I don't think you could do it without starting all of them from 0% milk" is not a valid basis for facts. I don't want to come across like a meanie, but no one cares whatever facts you make up in your mind using (pseudo) common sense. Milk production is very well documented and regulated.
  • maxerickson 11y ago
    Fairlife promotes that they do this: http://fairlife.com/ http://fairlife.com/ I doubt it is cheaper than a measure and blend process would be, so I doubt the majority of milk is so heavily processed. It could certainly be that some milk is being separated down to constituents and ingredients added back to other milk, but that would be to top off a blend, not the default process (because separation obviously costs more than doing nothing).
  • quesera 11y ago
    I think orange juice is the classic example. But orange juice isn't healthy before or after processing, so the point is lost.
• tilsammans 11y ago
  I am sorry but we can and we are doing this. I encourage you to read "Swallow This: Serving Up the Food Industry's Darkest Secrets" by Joanna Blythman. Most food if not every food that comes in a cardboard box has been assembled from parts, often from various parts of the globe. Vitamins and antioxidants are added to every processed food, iron is added to breakfast cereals, flavourings are used to change your perception of the food, caramel is added to meat to give it a nice brown color, "natural" extracts are in fact extracted using solvents, of which traces can be left in the food, and there is no need to put it on any label, because solvents are processing aids. It's really much worse than you think unfortunately.
  • icebraining 11y ago
    Adding addictives is different from wholesale assembling foodstuff from basic chemicals, as was described by Swizec.
    • MrDosu 11y ago
      This, it is important to stay accurate on these topics and not succumb to mainstream media fear mongering.
• mattlutze 11y ago
  This is actually where "natural flavors" comes from. They break natural products down to base chemicals, then combine those chemicals to produce flavors, scents and aromas. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-difference-be-2002-07-29/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-differ...
  • MrDosu 11y ago
    Yes, we do extract chemicals from all kinds of things. That still does not mean it is done with your tomato.
    • mattlutze 11y ago
      Which is why I was talking about natural vs artificial flavors in foods, and not basic vegetables. Not sure how my comment could have been interpreted as support for the previous poster's assertion that a hamburger was made from a stew of chemicals...
      • MrDosu 11y ago
        I wasn't contradicting you, tried to emphasize. Sorry english is not my first language :D