4 ms·
Let's assume that when I say statistics I'm talking about the scientific application of statistics and not Fox New's use of statistics, now to your questions:
by ryan-allen 12y ago
Let's assume that when I say statistics I'm talking about the scientific application of statistics and not Fox New's use of statistics, now to your questions:
1. Not always, but that is the nature of scientific research and you should know this.
2. I would say that they would, if you found yourself or a member of your family and/or friends were affected by a mental illness. Which, by the way, is very, very likely.
In regards to common sense, you can't always rely on it, and there is research to prove this.
As for your utilitarian measurement of what is useful to you or bullshit, great! You sound like you'd make a great engineer, as opposed to a research scientist. Though don't hate on the researchers, they discovered some of the things you take for granted in your day to day application of what is 'not bullshit'.
- analog31 12y agoMy education is in physics, and I work in industry. I would at least admit that I would not be very happy trying to do research in the social sciences. As for being diagnosed with a mental illness, rumors that practitioners follow diagnostic fads and over-prescribe meds, would prevent me from even seeking a diagnosis unless my suffering were really profound, which it isn't.