8 ms·
I would be apt to think that if there was a fair meeting of the minds, and not a Uber based over the barrel "agreement", then this is a non-issue. Every case w
by kefka 12y ago
I would be apt to think that if there was a fair meeting of the minds, and not a Uber based over the barrel "agreement", then this is a non-issue.
Every case where 1099's have complained, is because they are employees where the company tried to shove employment risk to the 1099.
- Silhouette 12y agoI would be apt to think that if there was a fair meeting of the minds, and not a Uber based over the barrel "agreement", then this is a non-issue. I don't know about the US, but the fixed hours/degree of client control is definitely an issue for employee vs. independent status in some places, and something you need to check in your local rules if you're in this position. Different places have very different rules about when to consider someone a disguised employee and probably tax either or both parties accordingly, and in some places the rules seem to be quite black and white.