> There's also a danger in users who will think that because the web is all "encrypted" now that must mean it's "safe", which will simply not be true. As I rem

> There's also a danger in users who will think that because the web is all "encrypted" now that must mean it's "safe", which will simply not be true. As I remember it, the proposal for mandatory opportunistic encryption was that it'd still be the http:// http:// scheme with no padlock, so no expectations are set but some benefit is there.