3 ms·
I am easily amused and I also know what intersectionality is. I'm interested in why you have the perspective that Satya was being honest and then recanted, sin
by tomlock 12y ago
I am easily amused and I also know what intersectionality is.
I'm interested in why you have the perspective that Satya was being honest and then recanted, since he pretty clearly stated that he misspoke, and it is easy to see how he misspoke. My perspective is he was speaking in terms of how tech ought to be for women, but failed to mention that the situation for women was currently different. The idea that women ought to be able to trust the system is a given, but Satya didn't say "but it currently isn't so" and in his apology he cleared that up. Good on him!
- formulaT 12y agoMy perspective is he was speaking in terms of how tech ought to be for women, but failed to mention that the situation for women was currently different. That's just completely wrong, watch the video again. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndm_RSvAgO4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndm_RSvAgO4
- tomlock 12y agoI disagree. Could you help me understand why you think he backed down rather than just clarifying his comments?
- formulaT 12y agoIf you watch the video, there is nothing that suggests Satya is not talking about the way things are in the workplace, not they way they should be. I just don't see where you are getting this idea from. Do you have a single source for this?