7 ms·

This email was released earlier, e.g. on Business Insider: http://www.businessinsider.com/snapchat-ceo-evan-spiegel-has-grown-up-2014-12 http://www.businessinsi

• logicallee 12y ago
  I meant that the source is still the leak. Honestly, this is Paparazzi-level stuff here. Plus, these are run-of-the-mill private emails, there is no public-interest angle here at all.
  • LunaSea 12y ago
    http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/336c3n/sony_emails_prove_that_sonympaa_are_actively/ http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/336c3n/sony_emai... You sure ?
  • choppaface 12y ago
    Ok, Business Insider was using the leak, fair enough. However, Business Insider did so in a derivative work and an article that praises Evan Spiegel. They demonstrated non-zero integrity by trying to positively steer the conversation over the leaked data. I don't think there's a strong enough consensus on the leaked data to warrant flagging. Certainly legitimate to downvote the link, but a flagging should require communal consensus on a position, no?
    • logicallee 12y ago
      Sure, okay. As far as HN, flagging is the only way to say something may be inappropriate for the front page - you can't downvote links :)