3 ms·
I've recently entertained the heretical thought that cubicles, as much as everyone seems to love to hate them, represent a good compromise between private offic
by chipotle_coyote 12y ago
I've recently entertained the heretical thought that cubicles, as much as everyone seems to love to hate them, represent a good compromise between private offices and open floor plans. Particularly when you talk about cubicles with "medium height" walls (around 53", from a little Googling), there's some acoustic and visual privacy from your neighbors, but there's still a good sense of openness.
Also, a cubicle provides many more places to store stuff: reference books, office supplies, all the papers your supposedly paperless office still finds a way to generate, and whatever you've personally done to make your workspace your workspace.
My cynical suspicion is that the biggest benefit open floorplans provide to employers is that they're much cheaper. Even if you buy everyone motorized sit/stand desks, floor mats and Herman Miller chairs, you're not only spending less per employee than you would on a cubicle (a standard setup with a generic chair, shelving and even a single file cabinet easily hits $2K), you're fitting more employees into the same space.
- hobs 12y agoWhen you add standing desks, 53'' is not enough to stop acoustic abuse from people doing things like concalls. This happens to me daily and even having conversations with people they still make the same mistakes. Its not a cynical suspicion, its just about stacking employees like Lincoln Logs to get the cheapest work space with the most people. Considering the profit that most of these employers are seeing per employee, and given their entire product rests on the brains of these people, it just seems penny smart and pound foolish.
- protonfish 12y agoI feel the same and regret bashing cubicles in the past, especially if you can sit facing the the door.